The relationship between the process of remembering and the process of self- narration in Horlock`s The Book of Lies and Roth`s Indignation

Authors

  • Najah Naif Al-Harby

Keywords:

discontent
book of lies
German occupation
identity
self
novel
memory
generational memory
crowded history
Nazism
maturity
adolescence
history
trauma
credibility
fallibility
pitfalls
war
security mania
suicide

Abstract

In the Book of Lies by Mary Horlock and Indignation by Philip Roth, the relationship between the process of remembering and the process of self -narration is embodied creatively. As a fellow contemporary writer Julian Barnes points out: ‘Memory is identity....You are what you have done; what you have done is in your memory; what you remember defines who you are; when you forget your life you cease to be, even before your death.’([1]).This paper will examine the profound impact of memory on the two narrators (protagonists as well); Catherine and Marcus, and how they construct identity in their narrations` process. It will shed light on how both narrators allow their past to illuminate their current lives. Recollecting past memories of school, campus life, parents and friends has a great influence on narrating the two stories.  Moreover, referring to historical memories of Korean War and German occupation of Guernsey is a significant factor of defining the (self) for Catherine and Marcus.

Author Biography

Najah Naif Al-Harby

Department of Languages and Translation | College of Letters and Arts | Taibah University | Madinah | Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Downloads

Published

2019-05-30

How to Cite

The relationship between the process of remembering and the process of self- narration in Horlock`s The Book of Lies and Roth`s Indignation. (2019). Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences, 3(5), 149-134. https://doi.org/10.26389/AJSRP.N01118

Issue

Section

Content

How to Cite

The relationship between the process of remembering and the process of self- narration in Horlock`s The Book of Lies and Roth`s Indignation. (2019). Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences, 3(5), 149-134. https://doi.org/10.26389/AJSRP.N01118